==============================================================================
WE THE PEOPLE PLATFORM — PILLAR 6: UNIVERSAL MENTAL HEALTH ACCESS
==============================================================================

Download type:  Pillar
Group ID:       P6
Generated:      May 12, 2026
Documents:      18

DESCRIPTION
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
All documents tagged with Pillar 6 (Universal Mental Health Access). Contains
18 documents spanning multiple folders.

DOCUMENTS INCLUDED
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  1. Adjacent Pillars Under Development
     02_Vision_and_Communication/02_Adjacent_Pillars_Under_Development.docx
     Best for: Readers who want to understand the platform's full scope
     including healthcare, childcare, and mental health. The companion
     document positioning healthcare, childcare, and mental health access as
     adjacent pillars to the three primary ones. Articulates the architectural
     intent for each adjacent pillar and the analytical work that has been
     completed at the concept level. Honest about which components are at full
     development versus which remain at concept level. When to read: Read
     after the manifesto if you want to understand the platform's full scope.
     Skip if you are primarily interested in the three primary pillars.

  2. Universal Mental Health Model
     04_Mathematical_Models/04_Universal_Mental_Health_Model.xlsx
     Best for: Readers wanting to verify the mental health pillar's workforce
     capacity claims. Analyzes universal voluntary access with workforce
     capacity considerations. Demonstrates that total workforce numbers are
     adequate at universal voluntary access utilization — distribution is the
     problem, not raw supply. The model covers approximately 60 million
     Americans needing some form of mental health care, current treatment
     gaps, and workforce expansion requirements through training pipeline
     funding. When to read: Examine if you want to verify that Universal
     Mental Health access is achievable. The model's most important finding is
     that the workforce problem is solvable through distribution rather than
     requiring impossible-scale expansion.

  3. Does This Raise Taxes? — An Honest Analysis
     05_Analytical_Framing/05_Does_This_Raise_Taxes.docx
     Best for: Anyone asking the most important question about the platform —
     does this raise taxes? — and wanting an honest answer rather than a
     slogan. Updated in v2.11 with cross-reference to What This Means For You.
     The median household side-by-side shows $33,584 current vs $17,355
     platform, with net savings of $16,229 per year. The wage floor mechanism
     contributes $3,516 (federal income tax reduction from $5,016 to $1,500).
     Adjacent pillars (healthcare, childcare, mental health) contribute
     $11,580. Civic Infrastructure (broadband, tax prep, identity theft)
     contributes $1,133. New 'How This Example Relates to What This Means For
     You' subsection in the Methodology Note explains why this document's
     figures differ from WTM4Y's at the same income/filer combination (broader
     scope including state tax, out-of-pocket medical, and childcare costs;
     transition-state FICA (Federal Insurance Contributions Act) treatment).
     Cumulative Lifetime Effects: nominal ($649K), inflation-adjusted nominal
     ($1,094K), and present value at 2% real discount rate ($444K). When to
     read: Read first when you want to understand what the platform actually
     means for your household budget. The document is honest about both what
     it captures and what it doesn't — the dollar comparison is one part of
     the story, supplemented by the public-infrastructure note and the
     intangibles section.

  4. The Path to Reality — Implementation Timeline and Stakeholder Requirements
     05_Analytical_Framing/05_Path_To_Reality.docx
     Best for: Readers who want to understand what implementation actually
     requires. Citizens evaluating their own potential contributions. Anyone
     moving from “does this work” to “how does this happen.” The
     implementation document describing what has to happen, when, and who has
     to do what. Organized in two parts. Part One is a phase-by-phase
     timeline: pre-enactment (Years -3 to 0, building political coalition and
     operational design), Year 1 enactment (legislative passage, Founding
     Stake collection, contribution system activation), build phase (Years
     2-5, workforce expansion and system integration), maturation phase (Years
     5-15, pillars reach full operation, compound benefits emerge, retroactive
     debt retirement begins), and steady state (Years 15+, the platform
     becomes the country's default architecture). Part Two is stakeholder
     requirements: citizens, companies, federal government, state governments,
     institutions (educational, healthcare, financial, childcare, mental
     health), civil society organizations, media, academic institutions,
     international coordination, and the political coalition. Includes
     critical dependencies, primary risks, and honest acknowledgment that the
     document is concept-level rather than operational specification. When to
     read: Read if you want to understand how the platform actually becomes
     operational reality and what your own potential contribution might be.
     Particularly valuable for citizens, organizers, and policy professionals
     thinking about implementation rather than design.

  5. Universal Mental Health Access Substantiation
     05_Analytical_Framing/05_Universal_Mental_Health_Access_Substantiation.docx
     Best for: Readers asking whether the platform can actually deliver
     Universal Mental Health access given the workforce constraint,
     particularly the severe psychiatrist shortage. Substantiates the
     Universal Mental Health Access pillar with depth comparable to what
     childcare and healthcare reached in v2.0. Covers service category
     differentiation (six categories with distinct workforce profiles),
     workforce expansion mathematics (the binding psychiatrist constraint that
     takes 67+ years to close through training alone), the three workforce
     mitigations (PMHNP expansion, redistribution from non-clinical roles,
     telehealth as force multiplier), telehealth integration with 1.5-2.5x
     capacity multipliers by service type, geographic distribution analysis
     (the hardest sub-problem; closes 60-80% of access gaps but cannot
     eliminate them), parity enforcement mechanisms (why MHPAEA isn't enough),
     collaborative care integration with primary care (where 70% of mental
     health treatment actually happens), stress tests, and honest
     acknowledgments. The Universal Mental Health Model is substantially
     expanded with five new sheets and 357 formulas (up from approximately
     30). When to read: Read this if you find Universal Mental Health access
     compelling in principle but worry about whether the workforce can
     actually deliver it. The document demonstrates that operational
     feasibility comes from combining workforce expansion, telehealth,
     redistribution, and collaborative care — no single mitigation is
     sufficient, but together they make universal access reachable by Year
     8-12.

  6. Universal Broadband: Two Paths Compared
     05_Analytical_Framing/05_Two_Paths_Compared.docx
     Best for: Readers asking which broadband approach the platform should
     commit to: Path A (free universal basic broadband) or Path B (universal
     access plus affordability subsidy for low-income households). Structural
     decision document comparing Path A and Path B across federal cost, total
     economic resource cost, coverage outcome, administrative complexity,
     household impact, industry effects, cross-pillar enabling, and political
     defensibility. Key findings: Path A federal cost ~$50B vs Path B ~$23B,
     but Path A total resource cost ~$71B vs Path B ~$123B (Path A is cheaper
     in total). Path A 100% coverage vs Path B effective ~88% coverage (15.6M
     household structural enrollment gap). Path A administrative complexity
     dramatically lower (no eligibility verification, no enrollment friction).
     Path A cross-pillar enabling substantially stronger (mental health
     telehealth, education online learning, Civic Technology platform,
     healthcare delivery). Document does not commit to a path; it presents
     structural analysis supporting the decision. When to read: Read this if
     you want to understand the structural choice the platform faced for
     broadband architecture. The eventual commitment to Path A (substantiated
     in the Universal Broadband Access Substantiation) was informed by this
     analysis combined with the Modernize Civic Engagement integrated
     argument.

  7. Universal Broadband Access Substantiation
     05_Analytical_Framing/05_Universal_Broadband_Access_Substantiation.docx
     Best for: Readers asking how Path A is operationally delivered: service
     architecture, technology mix, workforce expansion, federal contracting,
     regulatory reform, buildout timeline, stress tests. Substantive
     operational substantiation paralleling the Universal Mental Health Access
     Substantiation depth. Covers Service Architecture and Universal Service
     Standards (100/20 Mbps initially with evolution to 1 Gbps symmetric by
     2040), Technology Mix (60% urban fiber, 25% rural cooperative fiber, 9%
     FWA, 5% LEO satellite, 1% public WiFi), Workforce Expansion Mathematics
     (65K→165K peak fiber installers, training pipeline expansion across
     community colleges/apprenticeships/coal worker
     retraining/veterans/industry/cross-trade), Federal Contracting
     Architecture (per-connection wholesale payment, four-tier provider
     preference, quality monitoring), Regulatory Reform (Federal
     Communications Commission (FCC) mapping reform, pole attachment one-touch
     make-ready, Universal Service Fund (USF) integration, BEAD integration),
     Buildout Timeline (Year 1-7 to 100% coverage, $258B cumulative through
     Year 7, $48-50B steady state), Stress Tests (workforce, cost escalation,
     deployment slip, incumbent dominance, combined adverse — all within
     envelope), Cross-Pillar Effects, Industry Transition, and Honest
     Acknowledgments. The document substantiates the v2.4 Path A commitment
     with operational depth. When to read: Read this if you want to know how
     Path A is actually delivered, not just what it commits to. It's the
     substantive operational design that makes the commitment deliverable.

  8. Per-Citizen Cost-Benefit Model
     04_Mathematical_Models/04_Per_Citizen_Cost_Benefit_Model.xlsx
     Best for: Analysts wanting to interact with the per-citizen analysis
     quantitatively, test sensitivity, or generate scenarios for specific
     household types. Companion mathematical model to the Per-Citizen Benefits
     and Costs document. Sheets cover README, Assumptions (population,
     household sizes, income deciles, status quo spending baselines, all
     editable), Pillar Costs by Milestone (federal program costs at each
     milestone for all platform pillars), Sovereign Fund Coverage (corpus
     accumulation and disbursement coverage trajectory), Per-Capita Federal
     Cost (taxpayer share by income decile and milestone), Citizen Benefits by
     Category (broadband, healthcare, childcare, mental health, education,
     wage floor, retirement, civic engagement), Status Quo Baseline (current
     household spending on services platform replaces), Household Type Detail
     (7 household types × 6 milestones with benefits, costs, and net), Net
     Benefit Summary (consolidated reference), Lifetime Cumulative (30-year
     cumulative net benefit by household type), Dashboard. Average household
     net benefit grows from +$1,300/yr (Year 1) to +$19,500/yr (Year 30);
     cumulative 30-year benefit for middle-income family with kids ~$580K.
     When to read: Open this to test sensitivity on assumption changes,
     explore specific household scenarios, or model alternative deployment
     timelines. The model exposes the underlying arithmetic that produces the
     per-citizen claims; advocates and skeptics alike should be able to verify
     or challenge the numbers.

  9. We The People Calculator
     06_Presentation_Materials/06_We_The_People_Calculator.html
     Best for: Any reader who wants a personalized side-by-side comparison
     matching their specific household situation. Citizens, skeptics,
     organizers explaining the platform door-to-door, policy reviewers
     checking a specific scenario, and anyone whose household differs from the
     representative scenarios in the Does This Raise Taxes and What This Means
     For You documents. Single-file HTML calculator that runs in any modern
     browser with no internet connection required after download. Takes
     thirteen inputs covering filing status, gross household income,
     dependents, occupation-based wage floor (with editable defaults for four
     occupation categories), state income tax rate, health insurance premium,
     out-of-pocket medical, childcare cost per child, broadband cost, tax
     preparation expected value, plus methodology and payroll-state toggles.
     Produces a side-by-side comparison table matching the structure of the
     existing platform tables, plus a decomposition showing exactly how much
     each pillar contributes (wage floor, healthcare, childcare, mental
     health, Civic Infrastructure). Every constant is documented in a
     collapsible 'Show all assumptions' section: federal tax brackets,
     standard deductions, Child Tax Credit, platform contribution rates,
     healthcare and childcare effects, wage floor defaults by occupation, and
     explicit acknowledgment of what the calculator does not model. Tax math
     verified against the published examples in Does This Raise Taxes and What
     This Means For You. Includes 'Match document' methodology toggle so users
     can verify the calculator against the published comparison tables. v2.27
     update: The Calculator now implements the canonical OPEN-2 high-earner
     architecture (graduated income surcharge 5/10/15% above $250K/$500K/$1M
     for singles, doubled for MFJ; small wealth surcharge 0.5% above $10M net
     worth; wealth tax 2.5% above $50M net worth) replacing the prior
     simplified 2% surcharge. v2.27 also adds a collapsible business-side
     section implementing the Federal Infrastructure Fee architecture
     (location fee, employee fee with 25-employee exemption, revenue surcharge
     above $50M, public-purpose exemptions). When to read: Use the calculator
     after reading at least one of Does This Raise Taxes or What This Means
     For You so you understand what the comparison shows. Then enter your
     actual situation and see your personalized number. The 'Show all
     assumptions' panel makes every default visible; override any default with
     better information about your specific situation. The 'Copy results to
     clipboard' button produces a text summary you can save or share.

 10. State-Level Cooperation Requirements
     05_Analytical_Framing/05_State_Level_Cooperation_Requirements.docx
     Best for: Constitutional law analysts, federalism scholars, state policy
     professionals, and anyone evaluating the platform's deliverability
     through the federal-state structure of American government. Skeptics
     asking 'how does this work if Texas refuses?' Maps the platform's
     commitments into three federal-state categories. Pure federal commitments
     (federal income tax architecture, Sovereign Fund, Founding Stake, federal
     universal healthcare contributions, Direct File) deliver to all citizens
     regardless of state position. Federal-state cooperative commitments
     (universal healthcare delivery, universal childcare, mental health, Civic
     Infrastructure) work best with state cooperation but have federal-direct
     fallback options. Federal-funded state-administered commitments
     (restructured Medicaid, childcare provider networks, mental health
     delivery infrastructure) effectively require state cooperation. Examines
     constitutional constraints (anti-commandeering doctrine, conditional
     federal spending, NFIB v. Sebelius coercion test) and uses Medicaid
     expansion as the most relevant federal-state cooperation precedent.
     Recommends federal-direct delivery designs for state non-cooperation
     cases, partial-credit refund mechanisms for residents of non-cooperating
     states, and public tracking of state cooperation status as accountability
     infrastructure. Includes explicit Open Questions section. When to read:
     Read alongside the Federal Program Integration Plan and Federal Fiscal
     Impact Analysis when you want to understand the platform's federalism
     layer. Critical reading for legal analysts evaluating constitutional
     viability and for policy reviewers in non-cooperating states evaluating
     how the platform would actually affect their state's residents.

 11. Cohabiting Unmarried Couples
     05_Analytical_Framing/05_Cohabiting_Unmarried_Couples.docx
     Best for: Cohabiting couples (~17 million Americans) wondering how the
     platform treats them, family-policy professionals, and reviewers who
     notice that the calculator and comparison tables only support Single,
     MFJ, and HoH categories without explicitly addressing cohabiting
     partners. Works through the platform's treatment of cohabiting unmarried
     couples across each commitment. The federal tax system already treats
     cohabiting partners as separate filers; the platform inherits this
     framework cleanly. Per-individual benefits architecture (universal
     healthcare, childcare, mental health, Founding Stake) handles cohabiting
     couples consistently with married couples. Edge cases warranting
     attention include: dependent allocation rules for couples with shared
     children, the small differential in wage floor exemption between
     cohabiting and married couples (cohabiting often slightly higher due to
     per-occupation floors), Bridge Credit evaluation for couples whose
     household economy differs from individual filer status, mid-year
     composition changes, common-law marriage states (approximately ten), and
     domestic partnership registries. Mixed-status cohabiting couples
     intersect with the Non-Citizens And Platform Eligibility document. The
     platform's design is largely consistent with current law; this document
     makes the specific choices explicit rather than leaving them implicit.
     Seven Open Questions document remaining work, including coordination of
     Direct File for cohabiting couples' tax planning. When to read: Read with
     What This Means For You when your household is a cohabiting couple
     wanting to understand which scenarios in the comparison tables most
     closely match your situation. Read with Non-Citizens And Platform
     Eligibility if your household is a mixed-status cohabiting couple.

 12. We The People Overview Slideshow — Option A (Light Update; Twelve Pillars)
     06_Presentation_Materials/06_We_The_People_Overview_OptionA_Light.pptx
     Best for: Anyone wanting the lightest of three slideshow alternatives
     produced for comparison. Option A preserves the original 16-slide deck
     structure and adds one new slide for the four pillars added in 2026
     (P9-P12). (The original sixteen-slide deck has been removed in v3.7.5;
     Option A supersedes it for the same audience.) See also Options B and C.

 13. We The People Overview Slideshow — Option A (Light Update; PDF)
     06_Presentation_Materials/06_We_The_People_Overview_OptionA_Light.pdf
     Best for: Same content as the Option A PowerPoint, in PDF format for
     distribution and viewing without PowerPoint. Auto-generated from the pptx
     file via headless soffice export.

 14. We The People Overview Slideshow — Option B (Medium Restructure; Twelve Pillars by Funding)
     06_Presentation_Materials/06_We_The_People_Overview_OptionB_Medium.pptx
     Best for: Anyone wanting an overview slideshow that organizes the
     twelve-pillar architecture by funding mechanism. Option B is the medium
     restructure of three slideshow alternatives produced for comparison;
     preserves the original three-problems-share-one-solution framing and the
     three primary pillars detail; replaces the existing slide 8 with three
     new slides showing all twelve pillars organized by funding architecture
     (twelve-pillar overview, five payroll-funded pillars with P6+P8 combined
     into one cell, four non-payroll mechanisms).

 15. We The People Overview Slideshow — Option B (Medium Restructure; PDF)
     06_Presentation_Materials/06_We_The_People_Overview_OptionB_Medium.pdf
     Best for: Same content as the Option B PowerPoint, in PDF format.
     Auto-generated from the pptx file via headless soffice export.

 16. We The People Overview Slideshow — Option C (Full Rebuild; Life-Stage Organization)
     06_Presentation_Materials/06_We_The_People_Overview_OptionC_LifeStage.pptx
     Best for: Anyone wanting an overview slideshow that organizes the
     twelve-pillar architecture by life stage. Option C is the full rebuild of
     three slideshow alternatives produced for comparison; preserves the
     original three-problems-share-one-solution framing and the three primary
     pillars detail; replaces the existing slide 8 with five new life-stage
     slides showing how all twelve pillars map to childhood, working age,
     retirement and aging, with cross-cutting infrastructure pillars on the
     overview slide and a final funding-architecture summary slide.

 17. We The People Overview Slideshow — Option C (Full Rebuild; PDF)
     06_Presentation_Materials/06_We_The_People_Overview_OptionC_LifeStage.pdf
     Best for: Same content as the Option C PowerPoint, in PDF format.
     Auto-generated from the pptx file via headless soffice export.

 18. Persona-Based Reading-Path Simulations: Pillars 2-6
     05_Analytical_Framing/05_Persona_Simulations_P2_P6.docx
     Best for: Verifying that the platform's documentation answers the
     questions a persona-typical reader would actually ask. Walks a
     representative reader persona through Pillars Two through Six (Wage
     Floors, Education Fund, Healthcare, Childcare, Mental Health) and
     documents what questions each persona asks, where the answers are, and
     whether findable from cold start.

FORMAT
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Each document is included in two formats:
  - .docx — original Word document (best for editing or full-fidelity reading)
  - .html — self-contained browser-viewable version (works on any device)

The .html files include the platform's flag background, formatting, and
a navigation link back to the platform index (if you have the rest of the
package). They open in any web browser by double-clicking.

ABOUT THE PLATFORM
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The We The People Platform is a federal-policy reform proposal package
authored by Jason Robertson. The full platform consists of 109 documents
across 12 policy pillars. This ZIP is a curated subset.

Full platform: https://wethepeopleplatform.com
(or the platform_index.html page from the full package)

==============================================================================